ABSTRACT
This study was conducted to compare the anesthetic effects of 2,2,2-tribromoethanol (TBE, Avertin®) in ICR mice obtained from three different sources. TBE (2.5%) was intraperitoneally injected at three doses: high-dose group (500 mg/kg), intermediate-dose group (250 mg/kg), and low-dose group (125 mg/kg). Anesthesia time, recovery time, end-tidal peak CO2 (ETCO₂), mean arterial blood pressure, heart rate, oxygen saturation (SpO₂), body temperature, pH, PCO₂, and PO₂ of the arterial blood were measured. Stable anesthesia was induced by all doses of TBE and the anesthesia time was maintained exhibited dose dependency. No significant differences in anesthetic duration were found among the three different strains. However, the anesthesia time was longer in female than in male mice, and the duration of anesthesia was significantly longer in female than in male mice in the high-dose group. The recovery time was significantly longer for female than male mice in the intermediate- and high-dose groups. In the ICR strains tested, there were no significant differences in the mean arterial blood pressure, SPO₂, arterial blood PCO₂, and PO₂, which decreased after TBE anesthesia, or in heart rate and ETCO₂, which increased after TBE anesthesia. In addition, body temperature, blood biochemical markers, and histopathological changes of the liver, kidney, and lung were not significantly changed by TBE anesthesia. These results suggested that ICR mice from different sources exhibited similar overall responses to a single exposure to TBE anesthesia. In conclusion, TBE is a useful drug that can induce similar anesthetic effects in three different strains of ICR mice.
Subject(s)
Animals , Female , Humans , Male , Mice , Anesthesia , Anesthetics , Arterial Pressure , Biomarkers , Body Temperature , Heart Rate , Hydrogen-Ion Concentration , Kidney , Liver , Lung , Mice, Inbred ICR , Oxygen , Sex CharacteristicsABSTRACT
Objective To study the clinical application of midazolam combined with remifentanil in spinal anesthesia.Methods80 cases of vertebral fractures in Jiaxing hospital, Zhejiang armed police corps from February 2014 to December 2016 were selected as the research object in this study.They were randomly divided into two groups: control group and experimental group, each group had a total of 40 cases.Patients in the control group were treated with midazolam anesthesia, the experimental group was treated with midazolam combined with remifentanil anesthesia.Comparative analysis of the experimental group and control group of patients with vital signs and anesthesia recovery time and anesthetic effect indicators.ResultsAfter the corresponding anesthesia, the respiratory frequency and heart rate of the experimental group were significantly higher than those of the control group, with statistical difference (P<0.05).There was no significant difference between the control group and the experimental group, no statistical significance.The recovery time, the time of open eyes and extubation time of the experimental group were significantly lower than those of the control group (P<0.05).The excellent rate of anesthesia in the experimental group was 95.0%, and the excellent rate of anesthesia in the control group was 75.0%.As a result, the excellent rate of anesthesia in the control group was significantly lower than that in the experimental group, the OAAS score of the experimental group was significantly higher than that of the control group, with statistical difference (P<0.05).ConclusionThe application of midazolam combined with remifentanil in anesthesia of spinal fracture surgery, anesthesia effect is good, the patient's recovery time is faster, with the clinical significance of further promotion and application.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE:To investigate the effects of etomidate combined with propofol on painless gastrointestinal endoscopy and cognitive function of elderly patients. METHODS:Totally 90 elderly patients with painless gastrointestinal endoscopy were ran-domly divided into propofol group(30 cases),etomidate group(30 cases)and combination group(30 cases). Propofol group was given Fentanyl injection 1 μg/kg+Propofol injection 1.5 mg/kg;etomidate group was given Fentanyl injection 1 μg/kg+Etomidate injection 0.3 mg/kg;combination group was given Fentanyl injection 1 μg/kg+Propofol injection 1 mg/kg+Etomidate injection 0.15 mg/kg. The levels of SBP,DBP,HR,MAP and SpO2 at different time points,examination time,anesthesia induction time,recov-ery time and recovery time of orientation were observed in 3 groups. NCSE and MMSE score at different time points,the occur-rence of ADR were also observed in 3 groups. RESULTS:During examination,SBP,DBP,MAP and SpO2 of propofol group were significantly lower than before anesthesia,after examination and those of combination group,with statistical significance(P0.05). The recovery time and recovery time of orientation in combination group were significantly shorter than propofol group and etomidate group,with statistical significance(P0.05). The proportion of patients'memory ability,computing ability,orientation ability passing examination in combination group were significantly higher than propofol group,with statistical significance(P0.05). There was no statistical significance in MMSE score of combination group at different time points (P>0.05);MMSE score of propofol group 15,30 min after anesthesia and that of etomidate group 15 min after anesthesia were significantly lower before anesthesia and combination group,with statistical significance(P0.05). The incidence of apnea,hypotension and injection pain in combination group and etomidate group were low-er than propofol group,the motor response,myoclonus,nausea and vomiting in combination group and propofol group were lower than etomidate group,the tachycardia ease in combination group was lower than propofol group,with statistical significance(P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS:Etomidate combined with propofol anesthesia shows good therapeutic efficacy for painless gastrointestinal endoscopy of elderly patient,can reduce cognitive dysfunction and shortens recovery time,but doesn't increase the occurrence of ADR.
ABSTRACT
Objective To study the effect of different doses of dexmedetomidine combined with propofol and remifentanil in patients undergoing abdominal surgery. Methods 200 cases of abdominal operation in our hospital from January 2015 to August 2016 were selected as the subjects, and were randomly divided into the experimental group and the control group, with 100 patients in each group. Patients in the control group received 0.4μg/kg, dexmedetomidine hydrochloride injection combined with propofol and remifentanil anesthesia, and the experimental group received 0.8μg/kg, Dexmedetomidine Hydrochloride Injection anesthesia. The adverse reactions, extubation time and recovery time of the experimental group and the control group were compared and analyzed. Results After the corresponding dose of dexmedetomidine, the patients in the experimental group were 6 cases of nausea and vomiting, 7 patients with chills, 13 cases of adverse reactions, the total incidence was 13%. In the control group, shivering occurred in 23 cases, nausea and vomiting occurred in 12 patients, and the number of adverse reactions in 35 cases, the incidence of adverse reactions was 35%. The probability of adverse reactions in the control group was significantly higher than that in the control group, with statistical difference (P<0.05). The recovery time and extubation time of the experimental group were significantly lower than those of the control group, with statistical difference (P<0.05). Conclusion 0.8μg / kg dexmedetomidine hydrochloride Iinjection combined with propofol and remifentanil anesthesia in abdominal surgery is better anesthesia effect, can significantly shorten the time of patients with tube drawing, high safety, reduce the pain and risk of surgery patients has clinical significance in the further promotion and application.
ABSTRACT
Objective:To compare the efficacy and safety of ropivacaine and bupivacaine in combined spinal epidural anesthesia in abdominal operation. Methods:Totally 86 abdominal operation patients with combined spinal epidural anesthesia were randomly divid-ed into group A and group B with 43 ones in each. Group A was with ropivacaine anesthesia, while group B was with levobupivacaine anesthesia. The anesthesia effect, hemodynamic changes at different time points and adverse drug reactions were compared between the two groups. Results:The duration of sensory block in the two groups was not statistically different (P>0. 05), while the patients in group A had shorter motor nerve recovery time than those in group B (P0. 05). During the operation, the parameters at different time points in group A had no significant difference from those in group B (P>0. 05). The incidence of adverse drug reaction was not statistically significant between the two groups as well (P>0. 05). Conclusion:Ropivacaine and levobupivacaine show similar blocking effect on the sensory nerve with the same effects on hemodynamics and adverse reactions, however, the blocking effect of ropivacaine on motor nerve is weaker, which is more beneficial to the early exercise of the patients after operation.
ABSTRACT
Objective To study the clinical effect of nerve stimulator combined with low back piexus sciatic nerve block for the arthroscopic surgery anesthesia. Methods 86 patients who required the arthroscopic surgery from March 2010 to March 2013 in our hospital were randomly divided into observation group (43 cases) and control group (43 cases). The observation group accepted nerve stimulator combined with low back plexus sciatic nerve block under the arthroscopic surgery;the control group adopted waist hard joint anesthesia during the arthroscopic surgery. Data of hemodynamics, effects of anesthesia, anesthesias maintaining time, rehydration fluids and adverse effect in both groups were recorded and compared. Results The time for preparation and control of anesthesia operation (Tr), time for feeling completely block (T1), time for recovery (T2), time for completely blocking (T3), time for movement recovery (T4) in observation group were significantly shorter than that of the observation group (P<0.05); the first time of urination (Tu) after operation was significantly longer in control group than that in the observation group (P < 0.05); MAP in the control group were lower than that in the observation group 20 minutes after anesthesia (T20,P < 0.05); complications in the control group were more frequent than that in the observation group. Conclusion The clinical effect of nerve stimulator combined with low back plexus sciatic nerve block for the arthroscopic surgery anesthesia is more obvious , especially for patients with relatively long operating time.
ABSTRACT
Objective To compare the clinical intravenous anesthesia effect of sufentanil and remifentanil respectively, in order to provide data support for future clinical practice. Methods 91 surgery patients from February 2013 to October 2013 were selected and randomly divided into 2 groups, the one is sufentanil group (group A), and the other is remifentanil group(group B). The change of hemodynamic indexes, catecholamine concentration and woke up time after surgery in two groups were monitored and compared. Results Compared with T 0, levels of SP, DP, HR in two groups were signiifcantly lower (P<0.05), at the moment of T 2, the levels of SP, DP, HR level got signiifcantly higher(P<0.05), even surpass T 0(P<0.05). And the range of the rise in group A was signiifcant than that in group B(P<0.05).Epinephrine and norepinephrine of group A in T 2 and T 6, were higher than T 0 (P<0.05). The spontaneous breathing recovery time was, (5.2±1.9)min, open eyes’time, (7.2±2.0) min, and conscious time was(14.6±2.3)min in group B, which were lower than that of group A(t=14.382, 14.934, 14.382, P<0.01).There were no adverse reactions in both groups. Conclusion Remifentanil has good anesthetic effect, postoperative patients wake up soon, self breathing early. The change of hemodynamic index and catecholamine index are stable and beneifcial to internal environment balance.